<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Beer Genome Project &#187; Michelob</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beergeno.me/tag/michelob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beergeno.me</link>
	<description>Organically-generated, social networking to learn about beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Michelob&#8217;s StoneMill Organic Pale Ale</title>
		<link>http://beergeno.me/2009/04/review-michelobs-stonemill/</link>
		<comments>http://beergeno.me/2009/04/review-michelobs-stonemill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike VanDelinder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pale ale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stonemill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beergeno.me/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My internet connection cut out several hours ago, which means my plans to record a podcast episode this evening have been sufficiently destroyed. I’ve decided to take a crack at reviewing a beer the old-fashioned way, with keyboard and mouse. Truly what caught my attention with this beer was its cross-marketing. I have just poured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--StartFragment-->

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-765" title="2" src="http://beergeno.me/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/2-209x300.jpg" alt="2 209x300 Review: Michelobs StoneMill Organic Pale Ale" width="209" height="300" />My internet connection cut out several hours ago, which means my plans to record a podcast episode this evening have been sufficiently destroyed.<span> </span>I’ve decided to take a crack at reviewing a beer the old-fashioned way, with keyboard and mouse. Truly what caught my attention with this beer was its cross-marketing. I have just poured into a tumbler, the StoneMill Organic Pale Ale by Michelob Brewing Company. I’ve been saying since the beginning of our project that Michelob tends to be the more daring arm of Annheuser-Busch InBev. Here we have a brewery with a well-established name in the beer industry taking chances on what one might perceive as craft brews.<span> </span>To date I have been impressed with Michelob’s offerings, and this new organic brew may further develop the company’s foothold in the craft brew drinker’s mind.<span id="more-762"></span>
</span>
</p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>From a distance, the packaging of the StoneMill makes the beer look rather local. The label is very unassuming with a small painting of a watermill and small letter text. I had no idea I was picking up a Michelob until I saw the brewery’s small ribbon and name scrawled across the label’s top. In fact, not even the bottle cap has any indication that you are about to pick up a beer with such gravitas. The labels marketing this brew as organic outnumber the references to Michelob<span> </span>by at least two-to-one. I’m not one to typically go for the organic version of most things, but color me curious. For reference, the Alcohol by Volume (ABV) of the StoneMill is 5.5% and the International Bitterness Unit (IBU) rating is 22. Let’s go ahead and give it a whirl.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Appearance</strong></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The ale poured with almost no head on the top. Right now there is just a thin skin of bubbles covering the surface that have stayed since I began typing. The body is a rich gold in color, and crystal clear with only a few bubbles rising to the top. As I spin the beer around in the glass, I find little to no lacing remains.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Aroma</strong></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I find that most of the Michelob beers I have tried in the past year have been very similar in aroma. This one in particular is sweet and caramel-like (but not in an artificial way) with a light malting. The caramel notes play games with my nose, and I get a hint of banana as well. It possesses nearly no hop characteristics, which I have come to expect, and that’s okay with me.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Taste</strong></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>It seems silly to make your mind up on the taste of a beer within the first couple sips. You have a full twelve ounces to enjoy; let it soak in.<span> </span>The ale rolls in very smooth onto the tongue and is quite full-featured in its flavor. I don’t usually expect a Pale Ale to come off as anything but bland. Again, I believe there is a common thread among Michelob’s craft beers, as it has characteristics similar to both their Winter’s Cask Ale and the Jack’s Pumpkin Spice. The body feels light on the tongue, is quite crisp, but leaves a pleasantly malted aftertaste.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Overall Evaluation</strong></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I really like this beer and am continually impressed with Michelob’s ambition to play in the world of microbrews. This beer left me pleasantly surprised for being a pale ale, with a sweet, malted flavor and fresh aroma. According to Michelob’s website, they used a combination of organic Palisade and Hallertau hops. On the malt side, Michelob combined Metcalf and Harrington hops. These names don’t mean an incredible amount to me right now, but I am taking note because I have made knowing these names a priority in helping me define what beers taste good to me.<span> </span>The StoneMill is a solid offering from Michelob Brewing and I’ll claim it at a 4/5, if not slightly higher. It’s a refreshing beer with flavor and ambition. </span></p>

<!--EndFragment-->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beergeno.me/2009/04/review-michelobs-stonemill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 4: Cold Beers Bound</title>
		<link>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/episode-4-cold-beers-bound/</link>
		<comments>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/episode-4-cold-beers-bound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 04:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike VanDelinder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[episode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelnut Brown Nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue Brewery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter's Bourbon Cask Ale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beergeno.me/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first show where Shawn and I have been able to record in-person with each other, we take a chance on Michelob Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale, as well as Rogue Brewery&#8217;s Hazelnut Brown Nectar. We are also joined by our friend Nick, to give a third point of view on today&#8217;s beers and topics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="episode 4 artwork" src="http://beergeno.me/images/Episode%204%20Artwork.png" alt="Episode%204%20Artwork Episode 4: Cold Beers Bound" width="300" height="300" /></p>

<p style="text-align: left;">In the first show where Shawn and I have been able to record in-person with each other, we take a chance on Michelob Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale, as well as Rogue Brewery&#8217;s Hazelnut Brown Nectar. We are also joined by our friend Nick, to give a third point of view on today&#8217;s beers and topics of discussion.</p>

<p style="text-align: left;">Our tasting tip of the week is a discussion on the proper beer storage temperature and the style tip is regarding macro-breweries playing in the micro-brewery world.<strong></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Michelob Brewing Company &#8211; Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale</strong>
Style: Specialty Ale
ABV (Alcohol by Volume): 6.0%
IBU (International Bitterness Units): 17

</p>

<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Rogue Brewery &#8211; Hazelnut Brown Nectar</strong>
Style: American Brown Ale
ABV (Alcohol by Volume): 6.2%
IBU (International Bitterness Units): 28
</p>

<p style="text-align: left;">The Beer Genome Project #4 Show Notes</p>

<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">0:00-0:59</span> - Introduction
<span style="font-weight: bold;">0:59-3:26</span> - Michelob Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale
<span style="font-weight: bold;">3:26-7:34</span> - Rogue&#8217;s Hazelnut Brown Nectar
<span style="font-weight: bold;">7:34-13:37</span> - Tasting Tip: Proper Beer Storage Temperature
<span style="font-weight: bold;">13:37-18:50</span> - Style Tip: The Curious Case of Macro-Micros
<span style="font-weight: bold;">18:50-20:06</span> - Conclusion <span style="font-family: -webkit-monospace; line-height: 18px; white-space: pre;">
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/episode-4-cold-beers-bound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://beergeno.me/m4a-audio/BGP_episode_4.m4a" length="mp4/audio" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Selection for Week Four: Michelob Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale</title>
		<link>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/our-selection-for-week-four-michelobs-winters-bourbon-cask-ale/</link>
		<comments>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/our-selection-for-week-four-michelobs-winters-bourbon-cask-ale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike VanDelinder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter's Bourbon Cask Ale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beergeno.me/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For this week, we are reviewing a craft brew by a not-so-small brewery. Michelob has had a bit of a resurgence lately by playing in the microbrewery game. The Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale is their entry into the winter craft seasonal, and we&#8217;ll let you know what we think, later this week, when Episode 4 is released.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-312" title="michelob-winters-bourbon-cask-ale-medium" src="http://beergeno.me/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/michelob-winters-bourbon-cask-ale-medium.png" alt="michelob winters bourbon cask ale medium Our Selection for Week Four: Michelob Winters Bourbon Cask Ale" width="500" height="332" /></p>

<p style="text-align: left;">For this week, we are reviewing a craft brew by a not-so-small brewery. Michelob has had a bit of a resurgence lately by playing in the microbrewery game. The Winter&#8217;s Bourbon Cask Ale is their entry into the winter craft seasonal, and we&#8217;ll let you know what we think, later this week, when Episode 4 is released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beergeno.me/2008/12/our-selection-for-week-four-michelobs-winters-bourbon-cask-ale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

